Questão 96772

In contemporary linguistic discourse, the prescriptive approach to grammar, which dictates rules of correct usage, is often contrasted with the descriptive approach, which observes and records how language is actually used. While modern linguistics predominantly favors descriptivism, high-stakes professional and academic writing contexts continue to demand adherence to established prescriptive norms. Consider the following sentence: 'The data, which were collected over a period of six months, suggest a significant correlation between the two variables.' A strict prescriptivist might argue that 'data' is the plural of 'datum' and thus requires a plural verb ('were collected' and 'suggest'). However, the widespread use of 'data' as a mass noun has made the singular verb construction increasingly common and accepted in many circles.

Based on the intricate relationship between prescriptive and descriptive grammar, analyze the following assertions:

I. The choice between 'data was' and 'data were' exemplifies a purely stylistic preference with no grammatical implications whatsoever, being entirely dependent on the author's personal taste.

II. A descriptive grammarian would likely classify the use of 'data' with a singular verb as a valid linguistic development, reflecting the evolution of the language in practice, even if it deviates from its Latin etymological root.

III. In a formal context, such as a peer-reviewed scientific journal, opting for 'data were' demonstrates a higher level of linguistic sophistication and a conscious adherence to traditional academic standards, which may be strategically advantageous.

Which assertions are correct?