Questão 66708

A professor of comparative literature is teaching a course on Modernism and its intercultural articulations. She wants to challenge the traditional, Anglocentric view of Modernism, which often presents it as a movement that originated in Europe and the US and then 'influenced' the rest of the world. Her approach is to present Modernism as a global and polycentric phenomenon, a series of interconnected but distinct responses to modernity that emerged across the globe. She wants to explore the complex dialogues and intercultural exchanges that shaped different modernisms. To illustrate this, she plans a comparative study of two key modernist manifestos: F.T. Marinetti's 'Futurist Manifesto' (1909), published in Paris, and Oswald de Andrade's 'Cannibalist Manifesto' (1928), published in Brazil. The professor's goal is to show that the Brazilian modernist movement was not a passive recipient of European ideas, but an active, critical, and creative agent that 'devoured' and transformed them into something uniquely Brazilian. A key theoretical concept for the class is 'cultural appropriation' versus 'transculturation,' the latter being a process of mutual influence and creative synthesis.

Which of the following teaching strategies would most effectively highlight the intercultural articulations of Modernism, focusing on the relationship between the European avant-garde and Brazilian Modernism?