Questão 506620

Examine the following international law commentary:

'The doctrine of universal jurisdiction posits that certain crimes are so egregious that they undermine the normative fabric of the entire international community. Consequently, any sovereign state is entitled to prosecute perpetrators, irrespective of the locus delicti or the nationality of the victims or offenders. However, the exercise of this principle frequently clashes with the customary international law principle of sovereign immunity, sparking intense diplomatic confrontations when national courts issue arrest warrants against incumbent foreign officials.'

Evaluate the items below regarding the passage:

I. Universal jurisdiction does not require the offending conduct to have occurred within the prosecuting state's territorial borders.

II. Tensions frequently arise when universal jurisdiction intercepts the established tenets of incumbent sovereign immunity.

III. Customary international law does not completely forbid states from asserting jurisdiction over foreign nationals under any legal rationale.

Which item(s) is/are CORRECT?